Contract-to-Invoice Reconciliation
Recover overpaid bills
We identify discrepancies between your vendor invoices and signed contracts — missed discount clauses, expired pricing terms, renewal errors, duplicate charges. You pay nothing unless we find something verifiable.
Audit against your actual contracts
Line-by-line reconciliation against signed language — not benchmarks or generic invoice parsing.
Results in 48 hours
Initial reconciliation memo targeted within two business days of a complete document package — phased when portfolios are large.
Turnaround ref
TAT-STD-48H
You pay nothing upfront
Contingency on recovered overcharges — no engagement fee when findings do not support action.
Typical findings range from 1–5% of annual vendor spend when billing drift exists — exact outcomes depend on portfolio complexity and documentation quality.
Most discrepancies involve pricing drift, missed discounts, or duplicate billing once reconciled to signed terms.
Verification scope
What we actually check
Contract-to-invoice reconciliation — structured checks, not generic invoice scanning.
Contract pricing & rates
Executed MSAs, order forms, price lists
Renewal pricing drift
Caps vs list-price movements
Volume & tier discounts
Spend thresholds and commitment tiers
Duplicate charges
Repeated SKUs, seats, or usage blocks
Overage calculations
True-up math vs contractual formulas
Bundled SKU compliance
Package pricing vs à la carte splits
Amendment enforcement
Side letters applied to billing profiles
Vendor billing discrepancies
Invoice vs baseline entitlement
Verification model
How findings are verified
Every discrepancy is classified so finance knows what can go to a vendor as fact versus what needs legal or procurement judgment first.
Confirmed findings
Deterministic- Deterministic matching against contract and invoice fields
- Explicit contract violations (rates, quantities, dates, duplicates)
- Human-verified before delivery
- Suitable for vendor escalation with cited evidence
Review-required
Advisory- Ambiguous contract language or unstructured terms
- Legal interpretation needed — advisory only
- Clearly labeled in your report for finance & legal review
Evidence fragments
Audit artifacts
Deliverables read like working papers: clauses, reconciliations, and verification metadata tied together.
Contract § 4.2
“Pricing fixed for twenty-four (24) months from effective date.”
- Audit ref
- CLB-2026-014
- Verification
- Deterministic match
- Confidence
- Confirmed
Workflow
Audit workflow
Upload Invoices
Share your vendor invoices and contracts. Fully encrypted, GDPR compliant.
Billing Verification Engine
Deterministic contract-to-invoice reconciliation flags rate, discount, and duplication issues before human verification.
Review & Approve
Analyst-validated audit review confirms deterministic findings and labels anything ambiguous as review-required.
Dispute & Recover
Use the report to dispute overcharges directly with vendors. We provide the evidence, you make the recovery.
Upload Invoices
Share your vendor invoices and contracts. Fully encrypted, GDPR compliant.
Billing Verification Engine
Deterministic contract-to-invoice reconciliation flags rate, discount, and duplication issues before human verification.
Review & Approve
Analyst-validated audit review confirms deterministic findings and labels anything ambiguous as review-required.
Dispute & Recover
Use the report to dispute overcharges directly with vendors. We provide the evidence, you make the recovery.
Deliverable
What your report contains
Structured like an internal audit memo — so stakeholders know exactly what they are receiving.
Report components
Executive summary
Portfolio-level exposure and priority vendors
Confirmed discrepancies
Deterministic matches with cited clause + invoice lines
Review-required items
Ambiguity flagged for legal / procurement
Contract evidence excerpts
Quoted sections supporting each confirmed item
Recovery recommendations
Suggested credit memo or true-up language
Vendor escalation guidance
Fact pattern packaged for AP or vendor management
Operational drift
Why companies overpay vendors
Most leakage is not fraud — it is drift between executed agreements and billing engines that never resync.
Silent renewal increases
- Step 1Renewal window triggers
- Step 2Vendor publishes higher list price
- Step 3Negotiated cap not carried forward
- Step 4Invoice reflects uncapped rate
Renewal list-price mismatch
Observed frequently in auto-renew SaaS MSAs with annual uplift language
Missed volume discounts
- Step 1Spend crosses tier in a subsidiary
- Step 2Billing profile stays on base rate
- Step 3Discount clause unapplied
- Step 4Leakage until next true-up
Tier / commitment economics
Common where spend aggregates across entities without billing-engine sync
Duplicate line items
- Step 1Same capacity or SKU invoiced twice
- Step 2Splits across cost centers
- Step 3No automated merge
- Step 4AP pays both lines
Line-item integrity
Surfaces in high-volume AP queues and split billing hierarchies
Contract amendment drift
- Step 1Signed amendment updates economics
- Step 2Vendor portal profile stale
- Step 3Billing engine uses old SKU price
- Step 4Gap persists quarter over quarter
Post-signature hierarchy drift
Typical when amendments outpace provisioning / SKU catalog updates
Billing configuration errors
- Step 1Wrong product code or region multiplier
- Step 2Provisioning ≠ contracted entitlement
- Step 3Invoice generated from stale mapping
- Step 4Surface variance on reconciliation
SKU & entitlement mapping
Often tied to cloud consumption or enterprise SKU bundles
Most discrepancies we surface involve pricing drift, missed discounts, or duplicate billing — recoverable once documented against the contract.
Illustrative patterns
Example findings
Positioning examples only — production reports cite your contracts and invoices.
AWS
Synthetic15% committed-spend discount not applied
Datadog
SyntheticDuplicate monitoring charges
Microsoft 365
SyntheticRenewal pricing mismatch
Salesforce
SyntheticMulti-year discount ambiguity
Transparency
What we don't do
We don't integrate with your ERP or internal systems
We don't retain your documents after report delivery
We don't use your documents for foundation model training
We don't share findings with any third party
We don't require API access to anything
We don't charge anything if we find nothing
Every engagement starts with a signed NDA and ends with a written deletion confirmation.
Segmentation
Who this is for
Recovery-focused audit workflows where vendor spend is material enough that billing errors show up in real dollars — and contracts are dense enough to require structured reconciliation.
Companies at $250k+ vendor spend
- Portfolio large enough that basis-point leakage matters
- Enough contracts to hide drift across vendors
SaaS-heavy organizations
- Recurring subscription drift
- Renewal complexity and uplift clauses
Multi-vendor procurement teams
- Distributed ownership across stakeholders
- Order forms and MSAs across entities
Finance owning recurring subscriptions
- FP&A and AP both touching vendor bills
- Quarter-end true-up pressure
Complex renewal & amendment trails
- Side letters and order-form stacks
- Negotiated caps vs portal billing
Infrastructure
Security & Data Handling
Technical controls described the way infrastructure teams expect — not marketing fluff.
AWS Bedrock processing
Enterprise-configured workloads
Documents run through isolated AWS Bedrock stacks with enterprise data-handling posture.
No training retention
Inputs / outputs excluded
Provider controls apply so your engagement content is not used to train or improve foundation models.
Encryption
TLS + AES-256
Traffic uses TLS 1.2+; objects at rest use AES-256 on AWS-managed keys.
Legal posture
NDA-first
Mutual NDA before documents move; DPAs when procurement requires them.
Retention policy
Deletion ≤ 48 hours
Files removed within 48 hours of report delivery unless you request earlier deletion.
Commercial terms
No data resale
We do not sell or license your financial documents to third parties.
Human access
Authorized auditors only
Reviewers are limited to our audit team — no offshore processing farms.
Pricing
No risk. Pay only for results.
Free Audit
Contract-to-invoice discrepancy analysis
15% of recovered overcharges only
Invoice & contract analysis
Deterministic billing verification plus review-required items, clearly separated in the report
Detailed recovery report in 48h
Confirmed findings only — we never present inference as fact
Getting Started
Simple. Transparent. No risk to you.
Send us your files
Upload 3-6 months of vendor invoices and corresponding contracts via encrypted email or Google Drive link. NDA signed first.
We audit within 48 hours
Our team cross-references every invoice line against your contract. We flag confirmed discrepancies and items requiring your review separately.
You recover
Use our report to dispute overcharges with vendors directly. We provide the evidence. You make the recovery. You pay us 15% of what's recovered.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Trust
Security & compliance detail
Technical handling beyond the infrastructure summary above.
Credentials
Enterprise posture
- 01
NDA protected
Your documents are confidential and legally protected.
- 02
AWS infrastructure
Enterprise-grade security and data handling.
- 03
Human-verified findings
Authorized auditors validate confirmed items before anything ships.
- 04
48 hour turnaround
Fast results without compromising accuracy.
Find out what's in your vendor invoices.
Free audit. Human-verified findings. Results in 48 hours. You pay nothing if we find nothing.